Journal of SAFOMS

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  8 (2020)
Volume  7 (2019)
Volume  6 (2018)
Volume  5 (2017)
Volume  4 (2016)
Volume  3 (2015)
Volume  2 (2014)
Volume  1 (2013)
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Objectively Structured Clinical Examination in Postgraduate Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology to improve Clinical Examination Skills

Neema Acharya

Keywords : Clinical examination skills, Formative assessment, Objectively structured clinical examination

Citation Information : Acharya N. Effectiveness of Objectively Structured Clinical Examination in Postgraduate Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology to improve Clinical Examination Skills. J South Asian Feder Menopause Soc 2018; 6 (1):8-12.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10032-1126

Published Online: 01-06-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of Objectively Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in postgraduate training in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGY) to improve clinical examination skills. Materials and methods: Clinical examination skills of six presensitized postgraduate students were assessed though OSCE. Improvement in interpersonal and communication skills and skill of professionalism and procedural skills were assessed in successive sessions by guides using Dreyfus model. Results were analyzed by Student's t-test. Results: There was significant improvement in interpersonal and communication skills and skill of professionalism and procedural skills. Conclusion: Objectively Structured Clinical Examination is an effective method of evaluation for improvement in clinical examination skills of postgraduate students during their training in OBGY. Clinical significance: Objectively Structured Clinical Examination should be used as a formative assessment method to improve skills.

PDF Share
  1. Bordage G. Where are the history and the physical? CMAJ 1995 May;152(10):1595-1598.
  2. Mangione S, Peitzman SJ. Physical diagnosis in the 1990s: art of artifact? J Gen Intern Med 1996 Aug;11(8):490-493.
  3. Kern DC, Parrino TA, Korst DR. The lasting value of clinical skills. JAMA 1985 Jul;254(1):70-76.
  4. Dreyfus, SE.; Dreyfus, HL. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Washington (DC): Storming Media; 1980.
  5. Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Strodel WE. The objective structured clinical examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance. Ann Surg 1995 Dec;222(6):735-742.
  6. Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ 1979 Jan;13(1):41-54.
  7. Brown, B.; Roberts, J.; Rankin, J.; Stevens, B.; Tompins, C.; Patton, D. The objective structured clinical examination: reliability and validity. In: Hart IR, Walton HJ, editors. Further developments in assessing clinical competence. Montreal: Canadian Health Publications; 1987. pp. 563-571.
  8. Ram P, van der Vleuten C, Rethans JJ, Schouten B, Homba S, Grol R. Assessment in general practice: the predictive value of written knowledge tests and a multiple-station examination for actual medical performance in daily practice. Med Educ 1999 Mar;33(3):197-203.
  9. Davidson RA, Duerson M, Romrell L, Pauly R, Watson RT. Evaluating evidence-based medicine skills during a performance- based examination. Acad Med 2004 Mar;79(3):272-275.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.