Journal of SAFOMS

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Young Women: A Topical Issue

Amishi V Vora, Anuja Bhalerao

Keywords : Pelvic organ prolapse in young women, Stress urinary incontinence, Young prolapse

Citation Information : Vora AV, Bhalerao A. Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Young Women: A Topical Issue. J South Asian Feder Menopause Soc 2019; 7 (2):77-81.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10032-1189

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been documented in the oldest medieval literature as old as 2000 BC with its watershed moments. It affects millions of women worldwide. Since exact etiological data are not known, there is paucity of data regarding recommendations of surgeries, and apical prolapse in young women has concomitant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Recurrences are more common in young women compared with old women, and choice of surgery thus becomes a dilemma and puts a surgeon in a quandary. Moreover, reconstructive surgeons are inspired and fascinated due to intricacies and challenges of POP in the young women. Hence, genital prolapse in young women is a topical issue. Aim: To determine the characteristics of prolapse in young women with regard to grade, complexity, and associated etiological factors. Materials and methods: This comparative descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from June 2015 to December 2016 over a period of 18 months after obtaining adequate authorization from ethical committee. A nonprobability sampling convenience method was incorporated. All women attending gynecological outpatient department having symptoms of mass coming out of vagina were subjected to detailed history, examination, and investigations. They were divided into two groups: women less than 40 years were subjected to conservative surgery and women more than 40 years were subjected to anterior and posterior repair with concomitant hysterectomy. The results were compared. Results: The mean age of women less than 40 years was 34.54 ± 3.136 years, and mean age for women between 40 years and 45 years was 43.83 ± 1.617 years. The mean parity is less in women less than 40 years of age compared with older women, and though not statistically significant, there is a strong presence of family history of similar complaints in parents or siblings in women less than 40 years of age (15.13%). This is consistent with studies by Jackson that there may be a correlation between development of prolapse and collagen defects. On comparing the preoperative and postoperative POP quantification (POP-Q) in younger and older women, there was a significant improvement in anterior compartment and apical defects when compared with posterior defects and changes in genital hiatus, perineal body, and total vaginal length. In total, 13% of young women who underwent conservative surgery for POP had recurrence, which though statistically insignificant, it is a high percentage compared with older women undergoing surgery for POP. Older women undergoing surgery for POP had more complications (4/18–22%), kinking of ureter after a vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral fixation (11%), and secondary hemorrhage (11%). Conclusion: Young women have POP of low grade, usually have single-compartment defects, and are associated with low parity. A significant number of women have family history of POP contributing to low-density collagen as an etiological factor. Conservative surgeries in young women take shorter time, are associated with less complications, but are associated with more recurrence rates.


PDF Share
  1. Norton PA. Pelvic floor disorders: the role of fascia and ligaments. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;3(4):926–938. DOI: 10.1097/00003081-199312000-00017.
  2. Smith S, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. Role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96(1):24–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb01571.x.
  3. Jackson SR, Eckford SD, Abrams P, et al. Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse. Lancet 1996;34(9016):1658–1661. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91489-0.
  4. Versi E, Cardozo L, Brincat M, et al. Correlation of urethral physiology and skin collagen in post menopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95(2):147–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06844.x.
  5. Tegerstedt G, Nyrén O, Hammarström M. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16(6):497–503. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1326-1.
  6. Strohbehn K, Jakary J, Delancey J. Pelvic organ prolapse in young women. Obstet Gynecol 1997;9(1):33–36. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00218-4.
  7. Bump RC, Norton PA. Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998;25(4):723–746. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70039-5.
  8. Rinne KM, Kirkinen PP. What predisposes young women to genital prolapse? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;84(1):23–25. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00002-0.
  9. http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-5-JMIG-D-14-00183.
  10. Jack GS, Nikolova G, Vilain E, et al. Familial transmission of genitovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17(5):498–501. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-0054-x.
  11. Chiaffarino F, Chatenoud L, Dindelli M, et al. Reproductive factors, etc. and occupation and risk of urogenital prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;82(1):63–67. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00175-4.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.